Categories: Insur. Business

Delaware high court denies Albertsons coverage for opioid lawsuits


A coalition of major commercial insurers defeated a bid by grocery chain Albertsons to recover the costs of defending more than 100 opioid lawsuits under its commercial general liability policies.

Unsealed on Wednesday, In re Albertsons Opioid Insurance Litigation is the latest failed attempt by corporate policyholders to make insurers pay for “public nuisance” opioid lawsuits. In its ruling, the Delaware Supreme Court cited precedents from opioid rulings involving rival pharmacy chains RiteAid and CVS.

Albertsons, headquartered in Boise, Idaho, operates pharmacies in many of its grocery stores and has been named as a defendant in 109 opioid lawsuits brought by states, counties, municipalities and tribal governments seeking to recover the costs of the public health crisis.

The company sought coverage under more than 100 commercial general liability policies issued by insurers, including Chubb and American International Group.

The policies generally promised to pay damages the policyholder became legally obligated to pay “because of” bodily injury or property damage. Delaware courts have consistently held that the phrase “because of” implies a direct connection between the damages sought and a specific bodily injury. The governmental plaintiffs in the opioid lawsuits sought reimbursement for broad economic losses stemming from the epidemic, including the cost of public health programs, law enforcement and social services.

“Just as the Delaware Supreme Court held in Rite Aid and CVS, there is no coverage under the insurance policies at issue here,” wrote Judge Patricia A. Winston.

The court had noted in the Rite Aid case that if a public hospital had sued Rite Aid “to recover actual demonstrated costs of treating bodily injuries caused by opioid overprescription,” the policy would likely have been triggered.

Albertsons had asked the court to apply the laws of California or Idaho, where its operations are concentrated. The court rejected that move, finding that neither state had addressed the core legal question in a way that conflicted with Delaware’s approach.

Albertsons announced a $774 million settlement of the opioid suits on April 14, about two weeks before the ruling. It recorded a $600 million related charge, resulting in a net loss of $481 million for the quarter.



Source link

nabeelhassan565@gmail.com

Share
Published by
nabeelhassan565@gmail.com

Recent Posts

Transmission, symptoms, treatment: why is the Ebola epidemic affecting the Democratic Republic of Congo worrying?

This is the 17th epidemicebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo since the disease was…

38 minutes ago

NGINX CVE-2026-42945 Exploited in the Wild, Causing Worker Crashes and Possible RCE

Ravie LakshmananMay 17, 2026Server Security / Vulnerability A newly disclosed security flaw impacting NGINX Plus…

6 heures ago

Grafana GitHub Token Breach Led to Codebase Download and Extortion Attempt

Ravie LakshmananMay 17, 2026Data Breach / Cybercrime Grafana has disclosed that an "unauthorized party" obtained…

11 heures ago

Tea and microbiota: what benefits for the intestinal flora?

The intestinal microbiota is at the heart of your health. Good news: certain everyday actions…

14 heures ago

Funnel Builder Flaw Under Active Exploitation Enables WooCommerce Checkout Skimming

Ravie LakshmananMay 16, 2026Vulnerability / Website Security A critical security vulnerability impacting the Funnel Builder…

1 jour ago

Can you eat onions when you have cholesterol?

Raw or cooked, the onion is a food that leaves no one indifferent because of…

1 jour ago